Just How Essential Is the EPA Anyway?

President-elect Donald Trump has selected Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt to run the Environmental Protection Agency. If you’re even peripherally familiar with Pruitt’s environmental record, you know that this appointment is terrifying.

For those who don’t know about Pruitt, here’s the lowdown: he’s the poster boy for valuing polluters’ profits over people. Pruitt does not believe in climate change. During his campaign to run for Attorney General, he received $300,000 in campaign contributions from fossil fuel industries. Then he did their bidding by routinely backing fossil fuel interests over the environmental regulations that would protect people in his state. Oklahoma, under Pruitt’s leadership, sued to block the Clean Power Plan – an EPA regulation. In fact, Pruitt has sued the EPA multiple times throughout his career. Have you put the pieces together yet? The incoming administration has selected a climate-denying, anti-environmental industry flunky to lead the very agency he’s sued repeatedly. You can pinch yourself, but you’re not dreaming. This is real.

So how do we respond?

For one, we need to make sure everyone is aware of just how important the Environmental Protection Agency is. Many people do not realize that the EPA goes way beyond protecting the environment – it’s a vital agency that safeguards human health, our fresh water supply, and much more. We need to familiarize ourselves with the agency’s key accomplishments and convince others of just how important the agency is. The head of the EPA is a position that must be confirmed by a vote in the Senate; if constituents let their senators know they oppose this nomination, it could be voted down.

First, you should know that the EPA was proposed by President Richard Nixon and began operating in 1970 following an Executive Order he signed. So that right there is an important point: the idea of protecting our environment and human health is not partisan. This agency was a brilliant idea that came to be during a Republican administration and is something that virtually every President, Republican or Democrat, has taken seriously and prioritized as part of their administration.

The EPA was born following the public’s increasing concern about environmental pollution. It conducts federal research, monitoring, standard-setting and enforcement activities to ensure environmental protection.

Here are some of the EPA’s key accomplishments:

  • Established the Clean Air Act – which has prevented millions of premature deaths by reducing air pollution, reducing health costs by $22 trillion dollars. This has brought us a long way from the day in 1978 when Mets shortstop Jose Oquendo hyperventilated during a bad smog day at Dodgers Stadium.
  • Enforces the Clean Water Act and Safe Water Drinking Act to regulate the quality of our drinking water. The Clean Water Act has brought us a long way since Ohio’s Cuyahoga River caught fire in 1969.
  • Created lead-based paint restrictions in homes, cribs and toys so that babies like yours and mine will not suffer from the devastating developmental defects of lead poisoning. Phased out leaded-gasoline leading to a 77 percent reduction of lead levels in blood.
  • Cleaned up the Great Lakes, which contain 95 percent of America’s fresh water and provide drinking water to 25 million people.
  • Enacted protections to stop chemical dumping in our oceans.
  • Continuously monitors and bans pesticides that cause harm to humans.
  • Oversaw implementation of the Medical Waste Tracking Act after medical and other waste washed up on US beaches.
  • Encourages homeowners to test for radon – a gas that can cause lung cancer.
  • Ruled that hazardous wastes must be treated before they are disposed of on land, preventing toxics from seeping into our water supply.
  • Successfully regulated pollution when acid rain began corroding our bridges, killing trees and damaging water supply.
  • Issued new standards for chemical plants that reduced toxic air pollution by more than half a million tons each year.
  • Protected kids by requiring that schools test for asbestos.
  • Developed a comprehensive plan for addressing climate change, which includes the  Clean Power Plan.

In addition to these wide-sweeping regulatory accomplishments, the EPA has also historically served as the agency that assists communities when environmental disaster strikes, like the Love Canal disaster in 1978. It was the EPA that was authorized to identify parties responsible for the contamination of sites and compel them clean it up. More recently, the EPA restored air quality monitoring networks destroyed by Hurricane Katrina and assessed air quality in the hurricane-affected area to ensure public safety. When environmental disaster strikes, the EPA is there to ensure that polluters are held accountable, that communities are cared for, and that clean up that is promised actually happens.

If Pruitt comes into power, we cannot count on any of this. We will see rollbacks not only when it comes to tackling climate change, but on basic things, like protections of clean air and water. Things that have been in place for so long, for entire lifetimes, that we’ve come to take them for granted. They’re not sure things. We must protect them.

But it isn’t just federal protections that are at stake. The EPA has been an essential partner working to protect the environment here in Oregon. Here are just a few examples:

  • Conducted various projects on the Columbia River to reduce toxics and improve water quality.
  • Managed the Columbia River Fish Containment Report to assess chemical pollution in fish and advise when it isn’t safe to eat.
  • Develops and oversees clean up plans for local Superfund sites, like the Portland Harbor Superfund Site and the North Ridge Estates Asbestos Superfund Site. North Ridge is a residential subdivision in Klamath Falls where improper demolition of old buildings left behind asbestos. The EPA is the agency working to ensure that the site gets cleaned up properly, which is essential for the safety of those living in the subdivision. This could happen in any neighborhood, anywhere. What recourse would this community have if the EPA wasn’t there to enforce clean up?
  • Reduced perchlorate in Eastern Oregon (which can lead to hypothyroidism) after it was found in over half of the wells sampled in Oregon’s Lower Umatilla Basin.
  • Regularly fines companies that don’t comply with environmental regulations, like a Portland-based remodeling firm that failed to comply with lead paint regulations.
  • Conducts air quality testing, like that on Hayden Island and in North Portland.
  • Awards research grants to small businesses working to solve environmental issues, like this example in Cottage Grove.

This agency can’t go away. A dismantling or weakening of the EPA equates to a dismantling of the 50 years of environmental progress we’ve made. Doing so would leave our health unprotected and cause harm for generations to come. Contact your Senator and urge them to vote NO on Pruitt.

Related Posts
Filter by
Post Page
Living Green Featured Transportation Solutions Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Air Quality Climate Protection OCAP News Policy OEC News/Updates/Events Water News Toxics-Free Environments Media/PR/Statements Water Conservation
Sort by

Eco-healthy living-how to prepare your garden for fall

October 14, 2020, 5:32 pm


Oregonians attend DEQ hearing to speak against EPA rollbacks

Dozens of concerned Oregonians left messages of opposition to proposals that would reverse environmental standards that protect our climate from greenhouse gases and communities from harmful air pollution during a public gathering in
October 24, 2018, 4:33 pm


Help sway the EPA for clean car standards to stay

It’s personal. President Donald Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency has shown signs it wants to roll back Obama-era rules that thousands of Oregonians and dozens of Oregon businesses successfully achieved before they were adopted nationwide. At stake, rules that would “eliminate as much as
September 28, 2017, 5:57 pm


EPA Budget = OR DEQ Cuts of 45%

In the weeks following President Trump’s budget release we’ve all been scrambling to figure out how the cuts will impact Oregon – especially for our air, water and overall environmental health.  We know the projected 31% reduction to the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would include drastic cuts to state and local programs, and now we have a better idea of
March 27, 2017, 11:18 pm


Statement RE: Cuts to EPA & Scientific Research

Oregon must stand strong for environmental & scientific standards that protect our health and our economy President Trump’s proposed budget cuts to the environment and scientific research completely disregard the values we in Oregon have held for generations. “These major cuts to EPA will have real impacts on t
March 17, 2017, 12:38 am


Pruitt confirmed head of the EPA – Where do we go from here?

With the news of the U.S. Senate voting to confirm Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt to lead the Environmental Protection Agency, it’s time for all of us to pull up our bootstraps and get to work. As OEC shared before, Pruitt is the poster boy for valuing polluters’ profits over people. Pruitt does not believe we should tac
February 17, 2017, 6:38 pm


Fish Out of Water: Preparing for the next drought on May 4th Forum

It wasn’t a pretty sight. Last summer, 250,000 sockeye salmon—half of the entire annual run—died in the Columbia River when drought and high temperatures peaked in July. Farmers ran tight on water, too. Cities and businesses that usually take ample water for granted watched with alarm as reservoir levels dropped. And dropped. No one was prepared. Recent record winter rains have offset many impacts o
April 19, 2016, 5:26 pm


Duck, cover and be prepared: September is National Preparedness Month

From a climate perspective, Oregon is a potential haven. Some have speculated that as climate impacts become more pronounced, Oregon will be home to a growing number of “climate refugees” because of how amenable our climate is a warming world, compared to other parts of the globe. The realities of climate change are just one of many great reasons to live in Oregon. But if you’re like many other Oregonians, you read the New Yorker article about
September 28, 2015, 8:39 pm


1 Reply to "Just How Essential Is the EPA Anyway?"

  • Oregon Environmental Council | Pruitt confirmed head of the EPA – Where do we go from here?
    March 19, 2018 (8:34 pm)

    […] As OEC shared before, Pruitt is the poster boy for valuing polluters’ profits over people. Pruitt does not believe we should tackle climate change. Shortly after President Trump nominated him, OEC shared reasons Pruitt should not lead the agency that was created nearly 50 years ago to protect our air and water in this country. Read more about Pruitt and the history of the EPA and it’s impact in Oregon. […]