Clean fuels work, and here’s why.

The Clean Fuels Standard launched January 2016. The Standard offers a brighter economic and environmental future for Oregon by offering drivers more options when they fuel up. By gradually transitioning to cleaner fuels like electricity, sustainable biofuels, biogas and propane, Oregon will reduce transportation costs, support our local economy, create good-paying jobs, cut climate pollution and lessen our dependence on Big Oil.

The Clean Fuels Standard is a flexible, market-based, performance driven standard. Companies are already enrolling to produce or sell more clean fuels in Oregon, from Fred Meyer’s purchase of 500,000 gallons of renewable compressed natural gas for its local fleet, to Tesla Motor’s signing on to generate Clean Fuels credits from 697,000 kilowatt-hours worth of electric vehicle charging at Tesla-owned charging stations. And that’s just the beginning: new companies are signing up every day. Oregon’s Clean Fuels Standard is projected to:

  • Save Oregonians as much as $1.6 billion in fuel costs
  • Create between 800 and 29,000 jobs
  • Grow personal income by as much as $2.6 billion
  • Generate as much as $2.1 billion in Gross State Product


The Clean Fuels Standard requires oil companies to reduce carbon pollution from their gasoline and diesel fuel by 10% over ten years. The Clean Fuels Standard is technology-neutral: it supports different transportation solutions in different sectors and gives the oil industry options to either blend low-carbon biofuels or purchase credits from clean fuel providers for fuels like electricity that can’t be blended. The Clean Fuels Standard does not regulate the public, and it does not regulate gas stations and other Oregon small businesses.

There are a lot of homegrown clean fuels options, including electricity, biogas and natural gas, sustainable biofuels, and propane. Unlike imported gasoline and diesel, many of these clean fuels alternatives are being produced by Oregon businesses—and in most cases, these options are cheaper than gas and diesel.

Related Posts
Filter by
Post Page
Transportation Solutions Featured Climate Protection OEC News/Updates/Events Policy Toxics-Free Environments Air Quality OEC Membership
Sort by

U.S. Supreme Court passes on hearing oil industry challenge against Oregon’s clean-fuels momentum

The Clean Fuels Standard continues immense success, to remain for decades FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE May 13, 2019
May 14, 2019, 12:30 am


9th Circuit opinion preserves momentum for Clean Fuels Standards

Appeals court upholds lower court ruling dismissing industry challenge to clean-transportation policy created to address climate change PORTLAND, OR – The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion today upholding a lower court’s ruling dismissing industry claims against Oregon’s groundbreaking
September 7, 2018, 10:11 pm


Stand for Clean Fuels

Oregon has the opportunity to lead on climate.  
June 7, 2017, 7:28 pm


When Clean Fuels Win, So Does the Climate, Our Air, Our Oregon

Good news in the environmental world can feel hard to come by these days. That’s why it’s more important than ever that we elevate and celebrate local success stories. SeQuential Biofuels is one of those local stories worth celebrating. An Oregon business that recycles used cooking oil, SeQuential takes waste that would otherwise be thrown out with the nightly trash, and converts it into clean burning biodiesel. An early participant in the Oregon Clean Fuels Standard, P
March 25, 2017, 12:25 am


Clean Fuels: Fact vs. Myth

What the Clean Fuels Program does: Guarantees climate pollution reductions from transportation fuels by 10% over 10 years. How it works: Oil importers (all petroleum comes from outside of Oregon) must reduce their carbon footprint by investing in lower carbon fuels. All fuels are judged on their lifecycle climate impact. The cleanest fuels, such as waste grease biodiesel or biogas collected from landfills, are encouraged the most. Higher carbon fuels,
June 25, 2015, 11:24 pm


Urgent: Defend Clean Fuels!

In some ways it’s hard to believe, but in another sense it’s totally expected: big oil will stop at nothing to protect their self-interests, and that’s why they’re attacking our right to choose clean fuels and reduce pollution in Oregon. In a cynical political move, the oil industry just proposed three initiatives to repeal the state’s hard-won Clean Fuels Program. We can’t let this happen. The Oregon Clean Fuels Program is the
May 22, 2015, 5:40 pm


Clean fuels take the raceway

When standing next to a racetrack, a person expects to hear, smell and see certain things. Roaring engines, acrid exhaust and sleek race cars moving by in a blur. While there was plenty of horsepower and heavy metal at Portland International Raceway this week, things seemed just a little off from normal. Big rigs, garbage haulers, school buses, pick-ups, vans and cars of all shapes and sizes zoomed around the track. It looked more like a hi-speed commute than a NASCAR race. Some of
April 23, 2015, 10:11 pm


VIDEO: We Did It! Celebrating Clean Fuels in Oregon

Click below to play the video. Please share! In Oregon, we’re proving ideas that are good for all can defeat money and power in the halls of government. In February 2015, the Oregon Legislature overcame a $2 million opposition campaign by Big Oil
March 16, 2015, 7:24 pm


The Clean Fuels Program: David vs. Goliath

Sometimes David really does triumph over Goliath. Today, the Oregon Clean Fuels Program cleared its final legislative hurdle, clearing the way for meaningful carbon pollution reductions from transportation fuels. The Clean Fuels Program will guarantee 7 million metric tons of carbon pollution stay out of our air, equivalent to 37,500 rail cars of coal. Fully implementing this program is a critical step towards meeting Oregon’s climate goals. The Oregon E
March 5, 2015, 12:36 am


6 Replies to "Clean fuels work, and here's why."

  • Richard C. Freeman
    February 11, 2015 (10:24 pm)

    I have a Plug-in Prius, and I want Oregon to expand, not end, the Clean Fuels Program.

  • John O
    May 27, 2015 (6:02 pm)

    While I applaud your sentiments, remember that “electric” cars actually run on coal, and at less than 30% efficiency, once you take line losses into account; and while methane can fuel a car more cleanly than gasoline, big oil is still fracking the planet and destroying the groundwater to bring it to us, and it is still fossil carbon that is poison to the atmosphere. Clean biofuels–and from a practical standpoint, that means algal biodiesel for cars and methane from sewage etc. for heating and cooking–are the only way out of this mess. Wasting time on much of anything else is just making noise.

  • John O
    May 27, 2015 (7:02 pm)

    While I applaud your sentiments, remember that “electric” cars actually run on coal, and at less than 30% efficiency, once you take line losses into account; and while methane (or propane) can fuel a car more cleanly than gasoline, big oil is still fracking the planet and destroying groundwater people will need forever to bring it to us, and it is still fossil carbon that is poison to the atmosphere. Clean biofuels–and from a practical standpoint, that means algal biodiesel for cars and methane from sewage etc. for heating and cooking–are the only way out of this mess. Wasting time on much of anything else is distraction we cannot afford.

    Ethanol and methanol are lousy low-energy motor fuels, and hygroscopic so they rust out their transport containers, and it takes more energy to produce ethanol than it contains. Drop the gasoline engine in favor of more efficient (45% vs. 30%) turbodiesel, and we no longer need either, or biobutanol. Energy crops like switchgrass (and my understanding is that the cellulose-to-sugars pre-digestion needed isn’t fully developed yet, anyway) are worse than nothing if they displace human food production. Hydrogen fuel cells are a deliberate big-oil distraction; if they are ever cost effective, it will be decades in the future, and we cannot afford to waste the time. We could do a lot with forest and crop wastes, and good people are working on that. But for now we know how to save fuel–insulate and upgrade our buildings and force the U.S. automakers to European efficiency standards; we know how to make methane from wastes, that is mature technology; and we know how to pyrolize solid remnants into liquid fuels–Germany ran its WWII war machine on gasoline and diesel made from coal via the Fischer Tropsch process. The sticking point is finding the right algae and growing them efficiently, and the $18 billion/year in subsidies big oil steals from us would lubricate that research nicely.

    Integrated biofuels production–the waste streams from methane and algae production feed each other–can make fuel from wastes while cleaning up sewage and farming wastes and municipal food waste and yard/garden debris, cleaning up groundwater so it doesn’t poison the oceans, cleaning up carbon dioxide before it poisons the atmosphere, and the remnant is either food, or livestock feed, or soil amendments, or a biochar that can be buried to sequester carbon. In design, when the solution to one problem creates new problems, you are on the wrong track; when a solution to one problem solves several other problems, you have “solved for pattern” and that is likely the solution you should pursue. Integrating methane and algal biodiesel production solves for pattern in a way that no other proposed biofuels do, and that is where we should be spending our limited research time and money.

    • Jana Gastellum
      May 27, 2015 (11:35 pm)

      Hi John O,

      You’re absolutely right about utilizing waste streams and the benefits of closed-loop systems as being the biggest bang for the carbon buck. That’s exactly what the Clean Fuels Program incentivizes the most. Waste stream fuels, which include biogas (from landfills, dairy digesters, and waste water treatment plants), waste grease biodiesel, and cellulosic fuels made from ag residues, generally have the lowest carbon footprint. Cellulosic fuels are actually being produced now, including in Kansas, using ag residues that aren’t competing with food production. For more information on the state of advanced biofuels, check out this report by Environmental Entrepreneurs: Test runs on using algae oil have been done in Oregon and we’re excited to see the next phase of that development as well.

      But EVs also have a big carbon benefit. According to the Union of Concerned Scientists: “Given Oregon’s relatively clean electricity grid, the environmental performance of EVs in the Beaver State is impressive. An average EV charged in Oregon produces the carbon emissions equivalent of a gasoline-powered vehicle that achieves 75 miles per gallon.” (Source: And, of course, Oregon’s renewable energy requirements will make our grid even cleaner over time. In addition, residential solar systems are becoming increasingly available for EV drivers. EV4Oregon is also starting to deploy solar-powered charging stations in the Tillamook area.

      We also need to keep supporting increased fuel economy for all fuel/vehicle types, support transit operations, increase and enhance bike and pedestrian infrastructure, and design our communities to be less car-dependent.

  • Oregon Environmental Council | Climate Change is Real – So Is the Movement for Progress
    March 22, 2018 (11:01 pm)

    […] And I have worked with the climate community to champion each other’s priorities – from the Clean Fuels Program, to Coal to Clean, to a transportation package making mass transmit more accessible and […]

Got something to say?

Some html is OK